Perspective for my first impressions: First time viewer of Little Women, though I think I had previously bumped into the last half hour. Some of the Paul Lukas scenes were familiar. I have not read the classic 19th century Louisa May Alcott novel. View what follows as either tainted or enhanced based upon those revelations.
Little Women left me wanting more, especially more pre-New York. I’m not a big Katharine Hepburn fan but I’m a bigger one after finally having made my way to this title.
The dynamic between Hepburn’s Jo March and her sisters: Joan Bennett as Amy, Frances Dee as Meg and Jean Parker as Beth, can be a bit sugary at times but this didn’t cause me to enjoy them any less. I wouldn’t have minded them staying together even deeper into the movie.
Like Jo asks at one point: “Why do things always have to change just when they’re perfect?”
Hepburn’s Jo is the tomboy of the group. A writer, she experiences life to its fullest and does her darnedest not to hold back. An independent thinker, Jo is brazen and loud, typically bellowing out a declaration of “Christopher Columbus” to express shock, surprise or delight. We also get to see the other side of Jo, especially as she develops from late adolescence to young womanhood and these touches humanize her all the more.
Bennett’s Amy, an artist, is the brat of the bunch but has more than enough redeeming qualities to make up for her social affectations. Amy is obstinate and prone to selfishness but charitable upon reflection, as pure at heart as any of the March girls.
Frances Dee as Meg is the most traditional of the little women and her story takes the most common path of the period, quickly settling down into marriage, children, etc.
Jean Parker is Beth, the tragic sister. More in a moment.
Next door is the intimidating estate of Mr. Laurence (Henry Stephenson), who after a fearful build-up turns out to have a heart of gold. Jo is drawn to the estate because of Laurence’s grandson Laurie (Douglass Montgomery) with whom she romps about the outdoors throughout the tail end years of her carefree youth.
I’m most familiar with Jean Parker from Lady for a Day, which released just a couple of months ahead of Little Women in 1933. She’s my least favorite character in that movie and thus I almost always begin any Parker movie with a negative prejudice against her. Little Women gives me very positive memories of Parker to help counterbalance that going forward.
Parker really does break your heart in Little Women. Her shy Beth is the musical member of the family. Even her sisters are surprised when Beth accepts an invitation from Mr. Laurence to come play his piano. The old man is drawn to the kindness of the sisters, and of them all Beth is the one most giving of herself. A special bond develops between Mr. Laurence and Beth.
The sisters inhabit an insular world, one filled with love that remains ideal even when disappointment and tragedy pay a visit. It’s a world you wish you never had to grow up and leave.
But after some success at freelance writing Hepburn’s Jo does depart, leaving her warm yet isolated life with her family for the wilds of New York and pursuit of the writer’s life. An ambitious choice for a woman during her time. While nursing heartache over Laurie an unlikely match between Jo and neighbor Professor Bhaer (Paul Lukas) soon sprouts from what had begun as a student-mentor relationship.
Also of note in the Little Women cast are Spring Byington as the girls’ mother, called Marmee by them; Samuel S. Hinds in a smaller part as their father who begins our story absent due to Civil War service; John Lodge as Laurie’s friend Brooke; and, breathing life into yet another 19th Century widow of means, Edna May Oliver as Aunt March.
RKO’s Little Women is based on one of the most read and beloved novels of all time, Little Women by Louisa May Alcott. It is the third screen version of the story following silent versions made in Britain in 1917 and the U.S. in 1918. MGM remade it in 1949 with June Allyson as Jo and Columbia in 1994 with Winona Ryder in the part. It has also been adapted for television.
Directed by George Cukor with David O. Selznick supervising production in an uncredited capacity after having previously departed to MGM. Academy Award winning screenplay adaptation by Victor Heerman and Sarah Y. Mason with two additional nominations: Best Picture and Cukor for Director.
115 minutes with a New York premiere on November 24, 1933.
As you might expect Little Women proves a great title for all ages though not without its moments of melancholy and outright tragedy. Despite that hankie alert Little Women is generally uplifting and provides a fine role model for younger viewers in Jo.
For adult viewers it is likely to selectively recall the finer moments of your own youth and may likely jerk a few tears when personal memory meets idealized movie nostalgia.
Fine performances all around with Katharine Hepburn especially excelling and providing a benchmark for all future actresses. Hepburn did win her first of four Academy Awards for Best Actress at the 1934 Awards, but she had been nominated for Morning Glory (1933), not Little Women.
Little Women is available on DVD from Turner Home Entertainment. For even more bang for your buck pick it up with three other Katharine Hepburn classics as part of TCM’s Greatest Classic Legends Collection.
I viewed Little Women on Turner Classic Movies which is also where my accompanying screen captures come from. Check the top of TCM’s Little Women page for future air dates.
Amanda Rae says
This is honestly my favourite version of the film. I’m a huge fan of the novel, and have seen each version of the film. This was the last version I came across and I fell head over heels. Each actor and actress brings so much to their roles and fill them beautifully but none more than Katharine Hepburn. Aside from her lighter screwball comedies, I’m not a huge fan of Ms. Hepburn but for me she embodied Jo just the way Ms. Alcott wrote her to be. It was perfection. Thank you so much for your post!
Cliff Aliperti says
Thank you for reading, Amanda. Glad to hear that Alcott fans seem to find Hepburn’s performance every bit as wonderful as I did, I guess she really did nail it as several have told me today!
I enjoyed your post, Cliff! This is one of my favorite books which I have read countless times, and I’ve also been to Concord and toured Orchard House, the Alcott home. Although I love three later versions of LITTLE WOMEN — including the TV version — all for different reasons, I think this one probably feels the most like the book and is the best. The tone is very faithful. I’m so glad you enjoyed it!
Cliff Aliperti says
Glad I picked the right one, Laura! The next time I do a LITTLE WOMEN night I would probably pair it with one of the later movies rather than LITTLE MEN as I did on this night. Happy you enjoyed this, think I did the right thing to plead ignorance at the top–it’s brought wonderful conversation throughout today.
I saw LITTLE MEN years ago and from what I remembered, your review seemed pretty much on target! Love Kay but the movie was just all wrong.
The later versions all have their strong points, including the TV version which boasts a wonderful cast of veterans (Greer Garson, Robert Young, and Dorothy McGuire) plus I found William Shatner a surprisingly effective Professor Bhaer. Hope you will enjoy exploring them!
Cliff Aliperti says
Hmm, Greer Garson, I may need to find that — I don’t suppose TCM airs it in March?
Already having a hard time accepting William Shatner in that part though!
Hi Cliff. Great blog entry! I adore this version of “Little Women” too. One of the best. I am lucky enough to have two Hepburn gowns from the film as well. RKO really made some amazing films in the 30’s. Thanks!
Cliff Aliperti says
Very nice, Nick! I agree, RKO has quite a few winners during the decade. So glad TCM can air so many of them for us. Now, if they could just break out more ’30s Paramount titles I’d be completely happy! Thanks much!